Samsung bought two patents specifically for use in Apple trial, say attorneys

facetime

In the ongoing patent trial where Apple is claiming Samsung infringed five of its patents, and Samsung is claiming Apple did the same to two of its patents, it has been suggested that Samsung bought the two patents concerned specifically to sue Apple. The allegation was made by Apple’s attorneys, reports The Verge.

The original inventors on the video patent, for instance, originated in Oklahoma, and the gallery patent originally belonged to Hitachi. In the case of the video patent, Samsung disclosed that it paid $2.39 million to acquire it in 2010, the same year FaceTime debuted alongside the iPhone 4. Apple hopes that will stand in stark contrast with its five patents, two of which were filed the day the company introduced the iPhone, and all developed within the company …

Author Ad Placeholder
Will only appear on redesign env.

The two patents concern video calls over a mobile network, and a means of displaying and accessing photos. Samsung claims that FaceTime infringes on the video patent, and the Camera Roll within the Camera app violates the image gallery patent.

Buying patents with the specific intention of making claims against companies believed to be using the technologies concerned is not unusual: it’s the (unpleasant) business model of so-called patent assertion entities – more commonly known as patent trolls. But the idea of Samsung buying two patents in order to sue Apple in particular is a far more specific claim. It effectively accuses Samsung not just of being a patent troll, but of doing so with the specific intention of providing a counter-claim to legal action it expected from Apple.

Apple denies infringing either of the two patents, stating that FaceTime evolved from earlier work in the Game Center, and that there is no similarity between the gallery patent owned by Samsung and Camera Roll. Apple will continue to defend itself against Samsung’s claims for the rest of the week, before both companies make their closing arguments on Monday.

If Apple wins its claims against Samsung, the bill may be picked up by Google, with four of the five patents relating to Android rather than anything Samsung-specific.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

You’re reading 9to5Mac — experts who break news about Apple and its surrounding ecosystem, day after day. Be sure to check out our homepage for all the latest news, and follow 9to5Mac on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn to stay in the loop. Don’t know where to start? Check out our exclusive stories, reviews, how-tos, and subscribe to our YouTube channel

Comments

    • myfantasticshow - 9 years ago

      Exactly. In fact, this very news site had a piece recently about a patent troll that Apple invested in, I can’t remember if it was Rockstar. The author (who might have been Mr Lovejoy, but I’m not sure) tried to defend Apple by saying it was probably just a way to avoid being trolled by that same company. Yeeeeaaaahhh. Textbook double standard.

  1. thejuanald - 9 years ago

    That makes no sense. They bought a patent and used it in their products in order to sue Apple? Apple lawyers are reaching pretty hard here.

  2. Kenny Strawn - 9 years ago

    Even more of a reason why patent reform is needed… Let’s put it this way: if the judge rules in Samsung’s favor on the FaceTime note, Hangouts would also be gravely affected. So yeah, not cool.

    Then again, it would be unconstitutional for the patent reform law to revoke illictly-obtained patents ex post facto as well, so a constitutional amendment would also be sorely needed.

    • The idea of a patent is to encourage development and innovation. In turn the government protects inventors from intellectual property theft, giving the inventor a window of time in which to earn a profit on their idea before it enters public domain. Reforming patent law in the way you suggest would be to remove patent law. Anyways, no politician would carry patent reform through to a constitutional amendment. Career suicide.

    • jramskovk (@jramskovk) - 9 years ago

      Didn’t Samsung and Google enter an agreement in regards to patents and such? Given Samsungs relationship with Google, I would think that Hangouts would be unaffected by this.

  3. herb02135go - 9 years ago

    Camera Roll is different from Gallery? No way. They are identical.

  4. scumbolt2014 - 9 years ago

    Samsung = 💩

Author

Avatar for Ben Lovejoy Ben Lovejoy

Ben Lovejoy is a British technology writer and EU Editor for 9to5Mac. He’s known for his op-eds and diary pieces, exploring his experience of Apple products over time, for a more rounded review. He also writes fiction, with two technothriller novels, a couple of SF shorts and a rom-com!


Ben Lovejoy's favorite gear