Eat24 finds iPhone customers healthier than their Android counterparts

Screen Shot 2015-08-26 at 10.13.51 PM

Congrats, iPhone owners: Popular online food ordering service Eat24 has determined that you are healthier than users of Google’s Android. That’s based on data it collected from its mobile app over a three month period, tracking information regarding how ordering habits differed across the rival platforms.

To come to its conclusion, Eat24 first looked at its filters used for narrowing down local restaurant choices. Here, the company found that 27% of iPhone users whittle down their options to only the “Healthy” variety before choosing any other filters. That’s compared to 17% of Android users.

WhoOrdersHealthier

In defense of the Android faithful, we can’t accept this data as conclusive. Just because someone filters their results to healthy options before doing anything else doesn’t mean they go through with an order of healthy food. That being said, the data is again in the favor of iPhone users: Eat24 customers on iOS are 7% more likely to order vegetables (greens of the fried variety included) than those on Android. Perhaps as a runner-up prize, the company notes that Android users are 10% more likely to order spicy food. To that I say, man up, Apple campers!

WhoLikesTheirVeggies

If you think there has to be some shining light here for Android users, the final set of objective data Eat24 provides in its report would prove you wrong. The company found that Android users are two times less likely to order pickup — aka get off their couch and go somewhere — than their iPhone counterparts. Eat24 rightfully notes the other way to look at this, calling Android users “badass king[s] of the couch.”

pickupOrders3

Eat24’s comical study finishes up by pulling some totally scientific conclusions from other attributes of the competing operating systems, like what their logos represent and how many health-related apps show up in the first row of each others’ popular apps sections, to name two. Apple, of course, wins in these rounds as well. Now would be a good time to question why on earth each major upgrade of Android is named after a different dessert. So embarrassing.

Anyone can see that this study throws most of its punches at Android while masking the OS’s consolation prizes as wins. Don’t get too mad, though. Eat24 likes to infrequently release these half-joking reports, even saying in the conclusion of this one that the results are “Definitive proof that iPhone users are healthier than Android.” That’s a blatantly false thing to say if only for the small amount of data the company based its study off of, and if you really wanted to you could find other data to paint a story in Android’s favor. How about we call a truce and get to know more about each others’ health-tracking apps over a nice meal — I’ll bring the pizza, you bring a vegetable tray?

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

You’re reading 9to5Mac — experts who break news about Apple and its surrounding ecosystem, day after day. Be sure to check out our homepage for all the latest news, and follow 9to5Mac on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn to stay in the loop. Don’t know where to start? Check out our exclusive stories, reviews, how-tos, and subscribe to our YouTube channel

Comments

  1. Does this really surprise anyone?

  2. Luis Alejandro Masanti - 7 years ago

    Why do you say that it is a ‘comical study’? It can be presented in ‘comic mood’ o ‘comic style,’ but by no way it is comical.
    Why do you arrive to the conclusion that it was a ‘small amount of data’ if they do not state how much it was, other than ‘during three months’?

    I do not know for sure if your article is more ‘comical’ —in your sense— that the original one.

  3. twelve01 - 7 years ago

    My after work stops at McDonalds for “Apple Pay” testing isn’t helping

  4. amazingrugs - 7 years ago

    I hate to hijack the thread like this, but please 9to5 fix your site. It really is the most poorly designed site in this “newsfeed” style layout I’ve seen. From choice of font, sizes, weights, to color choices and picture quality, to amount of ads that appear between stories, it looks downright amateurish.

    I like the idea behind the layout change and I think it can work. Please please look at qz.com (Quartz) for the right way to do a continually scrolling site.

    You guys have good content, but its becoming harder and harder to want to come back to this site with how it looks and functions.

    • You’re right. The content is great but the website lacks quality. The old one was better. As I said in one comment previously, this should be done differently but I’m not going to repeat myself again. Who wants to see that comment will find it, it was the other week I wrote it again. Even if we look at commenting system alone, it’s poor. For example, I would find my comment very quickly if using Disquss but like this, it’s not gonna happen.

    • totencough - 7 years ago

      I applaud their efforts, but the site has become insanely hard to read and downright confusing to navigate. I miss have the “minimized” stories on the feed because they don’t even look like stories, the wide stretch is just too wide to quickly scan, and my senses are overloaded with bloated graphics, high contrast areas, and just too many things in front of my face to know what I’m looking at.

    • frankman91 - 7 years ago

      Yes! This is the only thing comments should be talking about right now!

      I used to constantly pop in to this site and just see what was new; since the update I come like once a month. It is so hard to read or surf good articles and I feel like the bulk of my browser window is very poorly used.

      Either roll it back or try something new…