Rough date set for round five of Apple v. Samsung patent trial, to (maybe) finalize damages

A rough date has been set for round five of the battle over Samsung’s infringements of Apple patents in five of its products. The Recorder reports that U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh has said that the revised damages will be determined by a jury trial in March or April 2016.

In case you need a refresher, the story so far is this. In round 1, the first jury trial, Apple was awarded $1B in damages. In round 2, Judge Koh vacated $450M of that award and ordered a retrial to determine a revised sum. Round 3 was that jury trial, with Apple awarded a lower sum of $290M – making a revised total of $930M. In round 4, the US appeals court ruled that while Samsung did indeed copy iOS features, it should not have been penalised for copying the general look of the iPhone, and therefore the damages should be reduced. The new trial, to revise those damages, will be round 5.

Unless, that is, the Supreme Court intervenes … 

Author Ad Placeholder
Will only appear on redesign env.

In a parallel track to the damages saga, Samsung has been attempting to appeal the original verdict, back in round 1. Its request to the U.S. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals was rejected last month, and it was reported that Samsung now plans to take the final step of appealing to the Supreme Court. Should the Supreme Court agree to hear the appeal, the damages case would be postponed pending that outcome.

Assuming the March/April trial does go ahead, Judge Koh is not allowing either side to drag things out. She has set aside seven days for the hearing, and is giving each side just one day – six hours – to present evidence. She is also limiting ths scope of that evidence.

The court will not permit the parties to expand the scope of the damages retrial and will not allow the parties to rely on new sales data, new products, new methodologies or new theories.

Koh will also be ruling separately on a further 13 products said to infringe Apple’s patents.

A Taiwanese court recently ruled that Samsung used trade secrets stolen from TSMC to help it win orders from Apple for the A9 chip.

Photo: Reuters/Dado Ruvic

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

You’re reading 9to5Mac — experts who break news about Apple and its surrounding ecosystem, day after day. Be sure to check out our homepage for all the latest news, and follow 9to5Mac on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn to stay in the loop. Don’t know where to start? Check out our exclusive stories, reviews, how-tos, and subscribe to our YouTube channel

Comments

  1. usmansaghir - 7 years ago

    This has been going on for so long now, definitely needs to come to an end. Both companies need to leave all lawsuits and concentrate on products! (Apple doing the better job then samsung)

  2. GMac (@AAPLintheTree23) - 7 years ago

    I like how the iPhone in the cover photo is jailbroken… lol

Author

Avatar for Ben Lovejoy Ben Lovejoy

Ben Lovejoy is a British technology writer and EU Editor for 9to5Mac. He’s known for his op-eds and diary pieces, exploring his experience of Apple products over time, for a more rounded review. He also writes fiction, with two technothriller novels, a couple of SF shorts and a rom-com!


Ben Lovejoy's favorite gear