Skip to main content

Review: Macphun’s Creative Kit 2016 makes boring photos beautiful, for a modest price


Great photographers are made, not born, and even the best photographers have plenty of unimpressive shots in their collections. But in the age of digital photography, it’s possible to create a great photograph without being a great photographer. You can even accomplish this days after snapping your photo, so long as you have the right post-processing software and a little time to play around.

Macphun’s Creative Kit 2016 ($150) provides photographers of all skill levels with six different tools that make bland or imperfect photos look great. This year’s Creative Kit includes the Pro versions of Macphun’s Focus, FX Photo Studio, Intensify, Noiseless, Snapheal, and Tonality, each renamed “CK” and expanded with extra features. All six of the apps are designed to be super easy to use, yielding great results even without diving into the manual controls, though there are rewards for tweaking their settings. Better yet, the standalone apps now work as plug-ins for OS X Photos, Aperture, Photoshop, and Lightroom, and can easily be used in combination with one another for even more powerful editing…

Key Details:

  • Bundle of six photo editing apps, each the “Pro” version (renamed to “CK” and enhanced)
  • Separate, powerful tools for depth-of-field, color and detail enhancement, noise reduction, removing objects, and B&W
  • Great value for all six apps


The six Creative Kit 2016 apps arrive as a single download with one installer. This is how the basic and Pro versions are regularly priced — bear in mind that Creative Kit 2016’s “CK” versions are all better than their “Pro” predecessors.

Do the math and you’ll wind up with a cost of $88 just to get the basic versions of all six apps, versus $315 for all six Pro versions. Since you’re getting the Pro apps, Macphun’s Creative Kit 2016 price is less than half the cost of buying those six apps separately. If you’re thinking of buying just two or three Pro apps, Macphun is effectively encouraging you to grab the whole Creative Kit instead. And that’s frankly a pretty good idea.

How do Creative Kit 2016’s Pro/CK versions differ from the basic ones? Each app varies, but they generally include plug-in support for Adobe and Apple photo editing apps, a collection of meaningfully better photo processing engines, batch processing capabilities, and some brand-new, CK-exclusive presets and filters.

Here’s what you can expect from each of the Creative Kit 2016 apps:

Focus CK


The point of Focus CK is simple: use post-processing software to mimic the depth-of-field effects offered by excellent lenses. Focus lets you choose an area of sharpness, then surrounds it with your choice of circular or linear bands of softness that create depth-of-field-like blurring. Presets enable you to quickly achieve appropriate “focus” for portrait, nature, architecture, macro, and tilt-shift photographs, while manual controls let you independently change the sharpness, brightness, and colors of blurred and focused areas. Beyond the speed and simplicity Focus CK offers, the power of its results — particularly tilt-shift-like blurs and saturation — is seriously striking, and masking tools give you pixel-level control over the effects if you want it.

FX Photo Studio CK


Macphun’s best-known app is also its most broadly-featured one: FX Photo Studio originated on iOS as a more powerful alternative to Instagram-style photo filters, and now possess an incredible array of over 200 filters and frames. The basic concept — use color-shifting, overlays, and underlays to make a simple photo “pop” — now has hundreds of possible permutations, injecting subtle or powerful colors and shapes into images. A single click on a preset is enough to make a dull image explode with improvements, while simple or full manual sliders let you fine-tune the effects. FX Photo Studio CK includes RAW support, as well.

Intensify CK


Intensify’s core functionality seems simpler than it is. Using presets (or your choice of manual histograms and sliders), it enables you to use colors and sharpening tools to reveal muted or hidden details in photographs — a great feature if you’re using a camera that produces sharp but flat-looking images. The results you’ll get from Intensify will depend on whether you’re trying to subtly enhance certain colors or really bring out buried elements in a picture, but the micro-sharpening, editing, and color adjustment tools go beyond what you’d find in basic photo editors such as OS X Photos. Macphun pitches Intensify as a way to recover the full dynamic range of photos lost when skies get blown out or shadows make things too murky, and it actually works.

Noiseless CKnoiseless

I’ve reviewed the standalone version of Noiseless in greater detail here, and it’s a truly great app: using your choice of a bunch of presets, you can instantly reduce grain and blocky noise in images, preserving much (if not most) of the original image’s sharpness at the same time. While I’ve seen some debate amongst serious photographers as to how the app’s noise reduction compares against standalone apps costing twice as much as the entire Creative Kit 2016 package, I’ve achieved excellent results with only a few minutes worth of tweaking even when I start with deliberately miserable-looking photos, such as the one above, which was severely underexposed and had tons of noise to eliminate. Noiseless is one of my most-used Macphun apps, and will likely be one of yours, too.

Snapheal CK

I knew nothing about Snapheal before testing the Creative Kit 2016, but was amazed to see how well it worked for its single task: effortlessly erasing things from photos. Doing nothing more than using the cursor to highlight objects I wanted to remove, then hitting a large “erase” button, I watched as a doorknob disappeared perfectly — replaced by a regular length of door — then repeated the same trick to delete a plant in the background. Then I only had to tick one box (“local” rather than “global”) to near-perfectly remove panels from the door; I show the slightly imperfect (but easily corrected) result as “Quick Snapheal” above, then an rapidly improved version using a built-in cloning tool as “Better Snapheal.” Snapheal accomplishes each of its erasures by analyzing the area to be scrubbed against either the whole of the image or the area immediately around it, operating as a super-smart healing brush. Even as a fan of Photoshop’s healing and content-aware filling tools, I was impressed by how well Snapheal worked with minimal user intervention.

Tonality CKtonality

Like Noiseless, I reviewed the standalone version of Tonality here, and found it to be an awesome tool: Tonality turns full-color images into astonishingly beautiful grayscale/black-and-white photos, or similarly limited-tone sepia, blue, or other variants. Once again, the app’s focus is deliberately circumscribed to do just one thing very well, letting you use a large collection of presets to choose the way you want your image to look. If you thought there was only one way to make a black-and-white photo, Tonality will quickly change your mind, as it creates highly stylized renditions that could as easily appear in old-time newspapers as in modern art collections.

Creative Kit 2016: Is It Worthwhile?


As much as I enjoy composing photos that look really great without any post-processing, I’ve learned to appreciate the extra value that photo editing tools can provide. The Creative Kit 2016 lets you re-visit old images, making them look better than they did when you took them. As a package, it strikes me as a superb value at its pre-order asking price: even individual tools can produce results that range from dreamy to hyper-detailed to subtle or punchy based on your preferences and mood. And when you use two or more tools together, you can produce even more amazing results — akin to the output of a more expensive camera — as demonstrated by the series below.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

I wanted to see whether I could use Creative Kit 2016 and an iPhone camera to replicate an image snapped with a $2,500 DSLR and $1,800 lens — with only 5 minutes of editing time. So I used both cameras to take roughly the same picture, then loaded Focus CK to replicate the DSLR’s depth-of-field. Using the app’s mask brush and eraser, I was able to easily draw atop the area I wanted to keep in focus, then use sliders to choose the amount of blurring, saturation, and blowing out of highlights I wanted to achieve for the background. Then, with only 1 minute to make level adjustments in Intensify CK (below), I was able to bring the iPhone image’s colors much closer to the DSLR’s originals. You can click on the full-sized images above to compare them.

Having shot digital photographs for over 15 years (and used photo editing software for at least that long), the highest praise I can give Creative Kit is that the six tools here routinely achieve different and better results than premium photo apps I’ve relied upon, including Photoshop and Aperture. Whether you’re a decent photographer looking to become good, a good photographer hoping to become great, or a great photographer wanting to create something iconic, Creative Kit 2016 will certainly have something for your needs. It’s a great investment in your past, present, and future photography.

Mac (OS X)

More From This Author

Check out more of my How-To guides and reviews for 9to5Mac here! In recent months, I published a guide to turning your digital photos into beautiful wall art (see Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3), as well as a lot of different topics of interest to Mac, iPad, iPhone, iPod, Apple TV, and Apple Watch users.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

You’re reading 9to5Mac — experts who break news about Apple and its surrounding ecosystem, day after day. Be sure to check out our homepage for all the latest news, and follow 9to5Mac on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn to stay in the loop. Don’t know where to start? Check out our exclusive stories, reviews, how-tos, and subscribe to our YouTube channel


  1. Paul Van Obberghen - 7 years ago

    A photograph is made the instant one pushes the button. Whatever you do with it after that, wont make it any better than it was the moment it was shot. A photo may perhaps “look” a little bit better after tempering with effects, (or most likely, just plain catastrophicaly worse), but it will never be a good photo because of the effects you may apply to it. Now, there are plenty of correction tools that are valid and even necessary, not to improve a photo but to render it as good as possible, at least how you want it to be.
    Like a good book is not measured by its cover, a good picture is about its content, not how it looks eventualy.

    • myke2241 - 7 years ago

      well that is just not true. its like looking at something from only one angle. what was your applied purpose is that everyone’s. fashion, portrait, product photographers etc often improve imperfections that would be otherwise impossible to remove or look awful if covered up with makeup. which is only one aspect or editorial. By the way if you told a customer that you probably wouldn’t be working with them again.

      • Paul Van Obberghen - 7 years ago

        You mis-read me. I said that correction tools are valid and often necessary. But, still, these are not making a bad photograph a good photograph, they are improving its rendering, which is different. A good photograph is not one that is technicaly correct (right aperture, exposure timing, focal used, etc,…) but one that says something important, unique, touching,…

      • Jeremy Horwitz - 7 years ago

        That’s your own value judgment. And based on the number of portraits, selfies, still lifes, architectural photos, etc out there, one that I don’t think the vast majority of people would agree with.

    • theronster - 7 years ago

      Terrible analogy. Books don’t spout form their authors without editing, neither does ANY OTHER FORM OF ART. Photographs are edited too, insomuch as what the photographer chooses to show and not show. Your absolutist notions about photography are simply completely fictional.

      • Paul Van Obberghen - 7 years ago

        You missed my point. As your friend above. The analogy of the book is that it (usualy) does not matter on what it is printed, the quality of the paper, the font used, it’s size, etc,… A good book is a good book, no matter what. Same for a picture. The picture is in the content

  2. Paul Inskip - 7 years ago

    no mention on their site that these apps work as plugins for OS X photos? Is this a new feature? wishful thinking? or a mistake/omission?

    • Macphun (@wearemacphun) - 7 years ago

      Hey Paul, Creative Kit 2016 will go live on October 15th. Intensify, Snapheal, Tonality, Noiseless will support the Photos extensions. The other two (FX Photo Studio, Focus) will be updated to support extensions shortly after. The App Store versions already support extensions. Let us know if you have questions.

      • Paul Inskip - 7 years ago

        Thanks for taking time to respond I’ll look forward to the 15th, particularly looking forward to support in focus as that’s a very nice tool :) thanks again

      • Jeremy Horwitz - 7 years ago

        Creative Kit apps work either standalone or as plug-ins, Nik collection does not. CK apps emphasize ease-of-use, Nik apps are more technical and in some cases more granular. Nik has 7 apps including an HDR app, CK has 6 apps (unless you count the bonus app bundled with the CK pre-order). Creative Kit sells for $90 preorder, $150 regular price; Nik Collection sells for $150.

  3. Not really a fan of this. Especially the photo that was touched up by Snapheal — the door has a lot of irregular waviness and strange blending where the knob and other features were removed. The results look very cheap and not worth the amount of time saving. Just use Photoshop and do it the right way.

    • Jeremy Horwitz - 7 years ago

      I mentioned in the piece that it was a quick correction deliberately left imperfect, just to show what could be done without much work. Just to demonstrate what could be done with 2 additional minutes, I added a third picture using the cloning tool (“Better Snapheal”).

      I’ve been using Photoshop for a decade or more, and its healing tools require more hand-holding than Snapheal’s. Macphun has come up with very powerful tools that are easy for anyone to use.

  4. godrifle - 7 years ago

    I purchased the Creative Kit, and was dismayed to discover that Focus Pro doesn’t work on El Capitan. It’s a known bug in version 1.03, and Macphun is promising a fix, but nevertheless, it’s disheartening to not be able to use it.

    • Smigit - 7 years ago

      I purchased the pack yesterday and the application launched. Does it crash after a while or something?

    • Jeremy Horwitz - 7 years ago

      Did you purchase CK 2015 or CK 2016, which hasn’t been released? Focus CK definitely works under El Capitan.

  5. Terry (@korstraw) - 7 years ago

    OK, bought the creative kit (2015) on 11 October. None of the Apps worked as plugins/extensions to Photos nor did Focus Pro work at all. Emailed Macphun to ask about the plugins/extensions issue, specifically if the 2016 upgrades would function as plugins/extensions and was assured 1. that all updated apps would have plugins/extensions functionality and that 2. the issue with Focus Pro was known and would be fixed. I received an email this morning with a link to the 2016 CK upgrade. None of the Apps work as plugins to Photos in spite of the email from Macphun assuring me that they would. A search around the inter webs tells me that only Apps bought from the Apple store work as plugins/extensions to Photos. Nor does Focus Pro work – I can see the original photo but if I select the portrait tab for example I get a black screen, pushing space bar brings the original photo back up.
    I find it disappointing (and that’s putting it very mildly) that this company sells software full well knowing that it doesn’t work at all (Focus Pro) nor function as promised in writing (plugins/extensions). Great big F to Macnotsomuchphun.

    • Terry (@korstraw) - 7 years ago

      Finally got this all working, no thanks to Macphun’s flawed purchase and upgrade process.
      First, you can have non-App store apps add extensions to Photos. What I had read about non-App store Apps was from Google themselves regarding their Nik collection.
      The problems I experienced (above in my initial posting) getting the Apps to work correctly with extensions were due to the fact that Macphun emailed me links to the ‘wrong’ products. When I finally got the link to the CK App installer all worked as advertised and expected.
      Now to have some fun using the Apps!