Skip to main content

Qualcomm found guilty of antitrust actions in Korea, must pay $180M+

As Qualcomm fights the Federal Trade Commission on antitrust charges in the US, it has just lost a case against another FTC: the Fair Trade Commission in Korea.

Korea’s FTC fined Qualcomm a total of 273 billion won ($242M) for antitrust actions taken from 2000 to 2009, but the chipmaker refused to pay …

It rejected the 2009 ruling and decided to fight it in court. The case reached the Seoul High Court in 2013, which ruled against the US company. Undeterred, Qualcomm appealed to the country’s Supreme Court.

It’s taken a further six years to get a ruling, but The Korea Herald reports that the court has confirmed the illegality of Qualcomm’s behaviour and upheld most of the fines.

Of the 273 billion-won penalty, the court ruled the chipmaker should pay at least 200 billion won [$180M], while the remainder needs be reconsidered at a lower court.

Qualcomm, which supplies communications chips to Korean smartphone makers like Samsung Electronics and LG Electronics, has been criticized for giving away incentives to smartphone companies that used more than a certain amount of the chip provider’s mobile communications and radio frequency chips. Such a practice, the court said, forced mobile phone companies not to receive chips from Qualcomm’s rivals. The kickbacks handed to the phone makers in 2000-2009 amounted to millions of dollars per quarter.

Back in the US, both sides in the antitrust case here have presented their evidence and made their closing arguments, and we’re now awaiting a decision by the judge. The Federal Trade Commission said that the evidence against Qualcomm was ‘overwhelming,’ while the chipmaker said that the FTC had failed to prove ‘actual harm.’

U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh has warned that it will take some time for her to make her ruling.

The legal battles between Apple and Qualcomm also continue. Latest developments there are that a US court has come down on the side of Apple, saying Qualcomm cannot seek damages for any patent infringements before the chipmaker filed its lawsuit. Separately, a German court has ruled against Qualcomm on four of its patent infringement claims, and will rule later on four more.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

You’re reading 9to5Mac — experts who break news about Apple and its surrounding ecosystem, day after day. Be sure to check out our homepage for all the latest news, and follow 9to5Mac on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn to stay in the loop. Don’t know where to start? Check out our exclusive stories, reviews, how-tos, and subscribe to our YouTube channel

Photo: Shutterstock


Check out 9to5Mac on YouTube for more Apple news:

Comments

Author

Avatar for Ben Lovejoy Ben Lovejoy

Ben Lovejoy is a British technology writer and EU Editor for 9to5Mac. He’s known for his op-eds and diary pieces, exploring his experience of Apple products over time, for a more rounded review. He also writes fiction, with two technothriller novels, a couple of SF shorts and a rom-com!


Ben Lovejoy's favorite gear