Apple and others comply with Judiciary Committee request for antitrust data

Apple and three other tech giants have begun to comply with data requests from the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee, which is investigating possible antitrust offenses.

Alphabet, Amazon, and Google have also begun to provide the requested data, though none of the companies have yet supplied all of the information required…

Author Ad Placeholder
Will only appear on redesign env.

Reuters reports.

The leaders of the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee said late on Tuesday that they had begun receiving data from Facebook, Alphabet’s Google, Amazon and Apple as part of their probe into the companies’ potential breaches of antitrust law.

The probe is one of several at the federal, state and congressional level aimed at determining if the companies use their considerable clout in the online market illegally to hurt rivals or otherwise break competition law.

“We have received initial submissions from Alphabet, Amazon, Apple and Facebook as part of our investigation. While we do not yet have all of the information we requested, we expect that all four companies will provide the information in short order,” the committee’s leaders said in a joint statement.

“We look forward to their continued compliance with the committee’s investigation,” they said in the statement.

Part of the data requested from Apple was copies of Tim Cook’s emails regarding App Store decisions.

Apple and Amazon didn’t respond to a Reuters request for comment, while the other companies declined.

Apple is facing antitrust probes in a number of areas. Most focus on the App Store, and whether Apple abuses its dominant position to treat developers unfairly. Some are unhappy about the 30% cut Apple takes, considering it too high, possibly resulting in consumers paying inflated prices for apps.

Others feel that it is unreasonable that Apple insists on in-app purchases as the only method of taking out a subscription within an app. Spotify has been one of the loudest voices objecting to Apple’s cut of in-app subscriptions, arguing specifically that it gives Apple Music an unfair competitive advantage.

The company filed a formal complaint with the European Commission back in March, and the Judiciary Committee in this month requested details of this complaint so that it can consider this issue in the US too.

Yet another question being asked is whether Apple gives undue prominence to its own apps over third-party ones in App Store search results. Apple’s actions in pulling third-party Screen Time apps after launching its own app are also being queried.

The Cupertino company is additionally facing antitrust lawsuits and investigations from customers, developers, South Korea, Europe, Russia, the FTC, and eight different US states.

Apple for its part has pointed to the huge revenue the App Store generates for developers all around the world, and to all of the services it provides to developers from hosting to marketing. Reaching any kind of conclusions about what is and isn’t reasonable will not be simple.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

You’re reading 9to5Mac — experts who break news about Apple and its surrounding ecosystem, day after day. Be sure to check out our homepage for all the latest news, and follow 9to5Mac on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn to stay in the loop. Don’t know where to start? Check out our exclusive stories, reviews, how-tos, and subscribe to our YouTube channel

Photo: Anna Moneymaker/The New York Times

Check out 9to5Mac on YouTube for more Apple news:



Avatar for Ben Lovejoy Ben Lovejoy

Ben Lovejoy is a British technology writer and EU Editor for 9to5Mac. He’s known for his op-eds and diary pieces, exploring his experience of Apple products over time, for a more rounded review. He also writes fiction, with two technothriller novels, a couple of SF shorts and a rom-com!

Ben Lovejoy's favorite gear