AT&T doesn’t want to be throttled for throttling customers
It seems AT&T thinks throttling the data speeds of customers without telling them about it isn’t such a big deal….
It seems AT&T thinks throttling the data speeds of customers without telling them about it isn’t such a big deal….
Typo, the iPhone keyboard case that bore more than a passing resemblance to the Blackberry keyboard, is being permanently withdrawn from…
Typo, the Ryan Seacrest-backed company selling an iPhone case with an integrated hardware keyboard, has been ordered to pay BlackBerry…
Apple has finally managed to secure a sales ban over some Samsung phone features that infringe on its patents and intellectual…
A Dutch appeals court today upheld a 2011 decision that banned the sale of Samsung’s Galaxy S II and Galaxy…
As if we needed someone to tell us that the ongoing patent lawsuits between Apple and Motorola in Germany were…
Samsung dropped its lawsuit in Germany seeking to ban the sale of Apple’s iPhone 4S. The South Korea-based company had…
In October, Taiwanese company Proview Electronics accused Apple of trademark infringement regarding the “iPad” moniker, with the company’s chairman promising…
We already knew back in December that Pearson, along with a handful of other publishers had decided to settle with…
The Typo iPhone case has been blocked from sale by BlackBerry, according to a report from Reuters. The smartphone maker sued over the…
Ina Fried at AllThingsD: According to the document, both sides are getting a nonexclusive, nontransferrable and non-sublicensable license to certain…
After execs from both companies could not come to terms in an attempt to settle, both Samsung and Apple take…
US District Judge Lucy Koh came down on Samsung today for infringing on Apple’s patents in a preliminary hearing on…
Just like Verizon, T-Mobile has chosen to side with Samsung in its fight against Apple reports Foss Patents. T-Mobile’s reason,…
Here’s the story (via Daring Fireball). The short of it is that Verizon asks the court not to issue Apple’s…
According to a report from Dutch publication Webwereld (via Computerworld), Apple has once again submitted doctored evidence related to their claims of design patent-related…
image via BGR As AT&T tries to swallow up the American wing of the German telekom, many have wondered whether…
FOSS Patents reports that the judge overseeing the Samsung vs. Apple case has ruled in Apple’s favor regarding Samsung’s request to examine Apple’s…
The stakes keep getting higher and higher in the Mark Papermaster case. Last week, a New York Judge ordered that Mark Papermaster quit working at Apple until further order from the court. This week, that same court has ordered IBM pay a $3 million dollar bond in the event that Papermaster was found to be damaged by the suit.
The $3 million bond is designed to pay for any costs or damages that Papermaster might suffer if it’s later determined that IBM wasn’t entitled to an injunction.
Karas noted that district courts are allowed "wide discretion" in setting the bond’s dollar figure, then added: "Based on a careful reading of the letters sent by the parties to the court, which are being filed under seal, the court finds that a bond in the amount of $3 million is appropriate to guarantee payment of the costs and damages that defendant may suffer, if the injunction should not have been issued."
Papermaster, today, counter-sued IBM saying that non-compete clause he signed with IBM is irrelevant because:
Apple won the permanent injunction against Psystar that it was seeking today. According to Groklaw, it’s total, including Snow Leopard. It also includes the Rebel EFI (which it is, as of this writing, still selling on its site) though Groklaw had this to say about the matter:
As for Rebel EFI, the judge while expressing that Psystar was not very clear about what it does, refused to exclude it from the injunction, and says Psystar continues to sell it “at its peril” at the risk of “finding itself in contempt if its new venture falls within the scope of the injunction.”
Only a clear explanation of the product, and discovery about it, can determine the matter, and Psystar is is free to bring a motion and submit to discovery about Rebel EFI, if it wishes to reopen the question. Since the injunction includes forbidding Psystar from “intentionally inducing, aiding, assisting, abetting, or encouraging any other person or entity to infringe plaintiff’s copyrighted Mac OS X software,” I’d think a reasonable person would find the injunction covers EFI as well.
Besides that, there is no ambiguity…
Supply of flash memory as used in iPhones, some iPods and some Macs seems under legal threat under a new lawsuit bought by the US subsidiary of UK-based patent licensing company BTG International.
The company has filed suit in the patent holder friendly US District Court of Texas accusing Apple, Dell, and Sony of infringing five of its patents related to flash memory technology by using chips from Samsung Electronics.
The patents relate to electronically alterable non-volatile memory cell chips used in consumer electronics products. The company is seeking treble damages and a permanent injunction preventing imports of devices using these chips, including a ban on the import of iPhones and the BlackBerry Storm.
Microsoft has secured court permission to continue distribution of Word in the US as the company faces an injunction to prevent the same.
Microsoft filed a motion to stay an injunction barring it from selling Word – an essential element of its Office suite with the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on August 18. The company has secured the right to appeal a ruling that Microsoft wilfully infringed a patent held by another firm (i4i) for processing XML.
Apple has prevailed in a long-standing iTunes action which claims the company has acted monopolistically in the way iTunes works seamlessly with the iPod/iPhone family, and no other devices.
The complaint alleges illegal "tying" in violation of the Sherman Act, monopolization in violation of the Sherman Act, and violations of California’s Cartwright Act, unfair-competition law, and Consumer Legal Remedies Act.